Elegant Mark Engineering

Blogs

How a Reworked Screw Barrel Improved Production Efficiency by 30%

In injection moulding, productivity losses rarely come from a single visible failure. More often, they originate from gradual wear inside the plasticizing unit—hidden, progressive, and expensive if ignored. When melt consistency begins to fluctuate, cycle times stretch, and energy usage increases, the screw and barrel assembly is often at the center of the issue.

This case study highlights how a targeted rework approach restored performance and significantly improved output without replacing the entire assembly.

The Challenge: Declining Process Stability

A customer operating a high-capacity injection moulding machine approached Elegant Mark Engineering with recurring process instability. The symptoms were clear:

  • Irregular melt flow
  • Poor shot-to-shot weight repeatability
  • Increasing cycle time
  • Rising power consumption
  • Overall output reduction nearing 25%

Despite repeated parameter optimization, performance continued to decline—indicating a mechanical root cause rather than a processing error.

Inspection & Diagnosis

Detailed inspection revealed uneven wear concentrated in the compression and metering zones, leading to loss of compression ratio, reduced melt homogeneity, internal leakage, and higher torque demand.

The Engineering Solution: Rework with Purpose

  • Precision sleeving to restore bore geometry
  • Screw flight reprofiling for improved mixing
  • Surface hardening and polishing to reduce friction

Results After Reinstallation

  • 30% increase in production efficiency
  • Stable cycle times across long runs
  • Consistent part weight with zero drift
  • Reduced energy consumption
  • Improved machine responsiveness

Most importantly, these gains were achieved without the cost and lead time of a new screw barrel assembly.

At Elegant Mark Engineering, reworking a screw barrel is not just repair—it is re-engineering performance.

Yes. Issues like polymer slippage, cushion variation, and inconsistent melt can occur due to micro-wear, incorrect screw to barrel clearance, or process imbalance even when the barrel appears dimensionally acceptable.

Typical indicators include inconsistent shot weight, fluctuating cushion, uneven melt flow, higher cycle times, increased power consumption, and frequent process corrections by operators.

Polymer slippage happens when the screw loses effective grip on the material due to surface polishing, incorrect compression ratio, material moisture, or mismatch between polymer type and screw geometry.

Yes. The ring plunger assembly, nozzle condition, back pressure settings, and material preparation all directly affect cushion stability during injection.

Wear concentrates in high shear and high pressure regions such as the compression and metering zones, especially when processing filled, reinforced, or recycled materials.

Rework is recommended when base material integrity is intact and wear is localized. Precision sleeving, surface treatment, and screw profile correction can restore performance at significantly lower cost and downtime.

Flight depth, compression ratio, mixing sections, and shear profile determine how uniformly the polymer melts and conveys. Poorly matched designs lead to temperature variation and unstable flow.

A worn or improperly matched ring plunger causes backflow during injection, leading to shot inconsistency, pressure loss, and unstable cushion even if the screw and barrel are healthy.

Absolutely. Excessive back pressure, incorrect screw speed, improper temperature zones, and unsuitable materials increase friction and accelerate wear in both screw and barrel.

Because many process issues originate from material condition, peripheral components, or settings rather than the barrel itself. A structured diagnostic approach avoids unnecessary replacement and ensures accurate root-cause resolution.